Jan 15, 2012
Print This Post
Check out this cover shot tweeted by Newsweek.
“Presenting this week’s cover: President Barack Obama! In which we ask, why are his critics so dumb? Newsstands Monday,” @Newsweek tweeted.
Here’s a link to the original tweet. Click here. The photo of this week’s Newsweek cover is posted below:
FOX News Talk
Wishful thinking on the part of lame stream media again.
Written for the 100 people who still read Newsweek.
What is the difference technically between Fascism and Communism? Relate your answer to the actions of the Obama Administration on the globalist scale versus the National scale and classify the general relation of each to the definitions. Discuss how the actions of the Obama Administration relate in regard to energy resource development blocking in the U.S., versus resource development being supported by our tax money in Chile, jobs and industries and businesses such as Gibson Guitars being pushed to go overseas, drilling platforms in the Gulf being allowed to slip away, NASA being re-tasked to bolster Muslim self esteem, consistent or inconsistent with the "de-develop America" while redistributing our wealth in developing third world lesser developed countries theme, in the book written by the science czar given to us by President Obama, Mr. Holdren? Is this a kind of "Globalist social justice" and is it the major theme in understanding the actions of this President? Is the status of G.E. in this context, going overseas while receiving the benefits of lucrative contracts, one of a company reacting to the stick versus carrot powers that a government has, when it turns to quasi-Fascist crony capitalism manipulations of business?
Typical Liberal media trying to cover for the failed "messiah." Sorry. Not going to get away with it the same way he did in 2008. Newsweek – what a sham.
obama will be re- elected
Louis Reyes Jr. Nah. He won't.
David Farmer yes he will
Notice the side article… they're already going after Rick Santorum's wife.. obviously Rick is a bigger threat to them than they are admitting.
And this is how Dictators start taking over…first the media then the military, then the people by force!
This is a joke. If it's not then I'm done reading Newsweek for free at the doctor's office. Andrew Sullivan is nothing but a two bit blogger.
I wish it was a joke. It's propaganda for the left.
Obama's critics dumb? Only appears that way to self-annointed elitist genetically defective Bolshevik criminals like those at that rag called "Newsweek".
Unfortunately, when critiquing this "President" and his farcsical "accomplishments", it is necessary to drop way down to their level. Like speaking slowly and clearly to the "intellectually challenged."
I know I am risking my life commenting on a Republican-biased forum, but I have one question for you. May I ask if any of you who has trashed Andrew Sullivan and Newsweek have actually READ the whole article or did you just react to the TITLE of the article without reading the article? If it is the latter, then it proves Sullivan is correct! If you bothered to read the article, you would realize it is an unbiased, impartial view, relating both the writer's criticism and his support of what Obama has accomplished.
Are you serious? All Sullivan did was blame George Bush for Obama's failures. Sullivan even admits that he writes the article "as an unabashed supporter of Obama from early 2007 on" so there goes your 'impartial' theory. I'm not sure what article you read or what planet you live on but it clearly wasn't the same article I read and you clearly aren't on this planet.
Sam Spade: Sullivan may be an Obama supporter but he provides both positive and negative points in this article which IS the definition of impartial. BTW I live in the real world…you on the other hand only live on the planet of the GOP. BTW Obama didn't fail; he accomplished a lot despite the Republican's obstructionism! … but Bush certainly DID fail in every aspect of the job!
Wow. That's really I can say.
Reading all the right wing bias on this comment page just furthers my agreement with the article. The article provides facts, and i hate to be the bearer of bad news but facts easily refute the bullshit you see on biased websites such as this.
I think everyone's missing the big question. Why are his critics so dumb? It's not asking Are they dumb? And Jerry springer didn't help the issue this morning lol.