- 3 American Doctors Killed At Afghan Hospital [VIDEO]Posted 13 hours ago
- The Balance Of Power: A Turning Point for The Tea Party?Posted 15 hours ago
- FOX on Tech: Is TV’s Future In The Hands Of The Supreme Court?Posted 16 hours ago
Thank The Government, Not Just Entrepreneurs, For New Technology
Were it not for government money much of what has been heralded as stand-alone entrepreneurship would never have succeeded, as Mariana Mazzucato write at Slate.
A quick look at the pioneering technologies of the past century points to the state, not the private sector, as the most decisive player in the game.
Whether an innovation will be a success is uncertain, and it can take longer than traditional banks or venture capitalists are willing to wait. In countries such as the United States, China, Singapore, and Denmark, the state has provided the kind of patient and long-term finance new technologies need to get off the ground. Investments of this kind have often been driven by big missions, from putting a human on the moon to solving climate change. This has required not only funding basic research—the typical “public good” that most economists admit needs state help—but applied research and seed funding too…
Apple is a perfect example. In its early stages, the company received government cash support via a $500,000 small-business investment company grant. And every technology that makes the iPhone a smartphone owes its vision and funding to the state: the Internet, GPS, touch-screen displays, and even the voice-activated smartphone assistant Siri all received state cash. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency bankrolled the Internet, and the CIA and the military funded GPS. So, although the United States is sold to us as the model example of progress through private enterprise, innovation there has benefited from a very interventionist state.