Gun Control Debate Heats Up

  • This is the short link.&media=&description=Gun Control Debate Heats Up" class="pin-it-button" count-layout="horizontal">Pin It
This is the short link.&media=&description=Gun Control Debate Heats Up" class="pin-it-button" count-layout="vertical">Pin It

Gun owners, advocates and enthusiasts aren’t all on the same page when it comes to gun control. While many remain in staunch opposition to more laws, others say they’re open to some additional rules.

FOX News Radio’s Jessica Rosenthal talked with many of them.

Audio clip:

Minutes after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, the phone calls started pouring in to victims of another mass killing, the Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting. Pierce O’Farrill was shot three times in that theater. He said when it comes to what should be done following this shooting, he didn’t have any answers.

(O’Farrill) “Really that’s the only advice I could have is just turn to God right now.”

But the debate over gun laws had already begun. While some wrote social media posts that read “now’s not the time to talk about gun control”… One response read: If dead kids don’t get the conversation started, what will?

Alan Korwin has written books on gun laws. He says the answer lies in arming teachers. But what if the teacher is shot first and all that remains are unarmed kids?

(Korwin) “Well you would have other teachers respond if they heard gunfire. We trust teachers with our students shouldn’t teachers be trustworthy enough to bear arms?”

Mary Ellen is from Texas. This week she went to a gun range called the L.A. Gun Club in her new hometown, Los Angeles. She had the same thought about arming teachers.

(Mary Ellen) “But then, I don’t think guns in schools are the answer either.”

Gun enthusiasts are mixed. David Prince owns Eagle Gun Range in Lewisville, Texas and he says when people want to kill they’ll find a way. Gun or no gun.

(Prince) “Timothy McVeigh used fertilizer and a rent truck to kill more kids than those children were killed by the rifle.”

And many who don’t want more gun laws say Connecticut had some of the nation’s toughest laws, adding that they won’t necessarily result in change because there are already millions of weapons out there. But some shooting at the L.A. Gun Club this week like Jimmy, say they’re open to new rules, like a federal assault weapons ban.

(Jimmy) “I see it as a slow transition.  The way this country has always been for guns it’s not something that can happen overnight. This is going to be years and years before we see real change and I think this is a small step towards that.”

He’s not alone. A survey of nearly 1,000 gun owners by Mayors Against Illegal Guns earlier this year, found that 74% of NRA members and 87% of gun owners would support background checks for all purchases. Most would also support letting states set eligibility requirements for people who want to carry concealed guns in public.

When it comes to proposals surrounding ammunition and magazine capacity, there’s a bit more sensitivity. California Senator Dianne Feinstein is proposing a law to stop the sale and production of magazines that hold more than ten rounds. Jason Hanson runs the Concealed Carry Academy in Utah.

(Hanson) “It’s pointless because you’re still gonna have guns you’re still gonna have magazines and they can insert multiple if a mass murderer wanted to go on a shooting spree.”

Regardless of where gun owners stand, they all agreed this is more about the potential actions of such a mass murderer.

(Gun Owner) “You can have the highest tech safety on guns, but if the people that use them aren’t responsible then there’s nothing you can do.”

(Gun Owner) “If you see something going wrong with your kids, then don’t let them have access to your guns. Keep the guns locked and that’s the only kind of gun control we need.”

And get them mental help, if needed. In that vein, Ted and Edmund of Marshall Security Training Academy in California want firearms training before a gun purchase as well as mental testing.

(Ted and Edmund) “I think they could go a little farther on the background checks.// Go to a psychologist, as far as a like doctors’ records, you know, see what the person is, see if there’s any mental problem? I would like that you know?// Yeah, there definitely needs to be some changes, yeah.”

Aside from additional state laws, federal laws are being considered too. President Obama said he expects concrete proposals from a special task force by January.

Jessica Rosenthal, FOX News Radio.

5 Comments

  1. kerry griffis

    December 21, 2012 at 11:03 am

    I believe that as Americans we should continue to have the right to bear arms. What happened to those children was something out of a nightmare but banning guns will not stop a crazy person on a mission. I agree that intense background checks may help to weed out the crazies but not in this case. The guns belong to the boy's mother. I believe that if gun ownership is outlawed criminals will still find a way to own guns making unarmed, law-abiding, Americans sitting ducks.

  2. Don Williams

    December 21, 2012 at 11:29 am

    No gun ever killed by itself. People will use any means to do what ever they intend to do. New, or stronger gun laws are not the right answer, however this administration has shown they will use any means to justify their goals to disarm the American People. People that have problems or issues as they call them, will find a way to kill. I have not heard of any proposed ban on the types of vehicles the killers used, nor any bans on types of people. Fast and Furious was a failed attempt by the current administration to stop Gun Shows. What else will those in this administration do to cause the American Public to cowar into accepting new gun laws. Ask Hiraldo how many of those people he saw in mass graves overseas could have been saved, if they had not been disarmed by their governments. I, and any other decent American should have the ability own whatever small arms weapon I want. Even ones that resemble military assault weapons. In this country, we do have the freedom to own assault weapons being select fire or just full auto weapons if we are not criminals or mentally disturbed. We also have the ability to own, posses and use semi-auto's that resemble them. Put the blame where it belongs. Not on the weapons, but on the people.

  3. aaron simmons

    December 22, 2012 at 10:30 am

    I have been around guns my whole life I use guns for hunting, trapshooting and personal protection. The police cannot be everywhere I am not naive I know ultimately I am responsible for the safety of my family. Therefore, I will fight against anymore gun control.

  4. Bishop

    April 8, 2013 at 12:46 pm

    I learned in Iraq that there is really no such thing as safety. The rest of the world understands this. We're no a utopia. 9/11 reminded us of that. Unless you want a police state, we need to accept this reality. Consider ourselves fortunate that we have a low incidence rate of these horrible events. Tragic as the most recent event were, they are statistically not on the rise. We are not in crisis, no matter how many times the clips are run on CNN, no matter how many bills Diane Feinstein writes. It's not feasible to place a security guard on every corner. This is expensive and reactive, not being proactive.

    The remedy no one is talking about is that we need to get back to what our parents and grandparents did. Work at your marriage and keep the family together. Go to church regularly and build relationships with your congregation. Know your kids, their friends, and what they're up to. A large part of the answer is to know your neighbors. Stop being afraid of them. Rebuild our communities. It's only through these methods that we will build personal character and support networks and become resilient to these social diseases.

  5. Bishop

    April 8, 2013 at 12:59 pm

    I learned in Iraq that there is really no such thing as safety. The rest of the world understands this. We're no a utopia. 9/11 reminded us of that. Unless you want a police state, we need to accept this reality. Consider ourselves fortunate that we have a low incidence rate of these horrible events. Tragic as the most recent event were, they are statistically not on the rise. We are not in crisis, no matter how many times the clips are run on CNN, no matter how many bills Diane Feinstein writes. It's not feasible to place a security guard on every corner. This is expensive and reactive, not proactive.