- At Least Two Dozen Killed in Massive OK Tornado [VIDEO]Posted 7 hours ago
- Apple Pie-Eating RecordPosted 12 hours ago
- The Doors’ Ray Manzarek Dies [VIDEO]Posted 16 hours ago
- Housecall for Health: Dirty HandbagsPosted 17 hours ago
Susan Rice Meets With GOP Critics Over Libya [VIDEO]
President Obama’s possible nominee for Secretary of State, Susan Rice, sitting down Tuesday with Republican Senators critical of what she knew about the Benghazi attack and when she knew it.
FOX News Radio’s Jared Halpern reports from Washington:
Audio clip:
Republican lawmakers say they are not satisfied after a closed-door sit down with UN Ambassador Susan Rice about September’s deadly attack in Benghazi, Libya.
(Graham) “Bottom line, I’m more disturbed now than I was before.”
South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham.
Days after Benghazi attack, Rice described the event as an out of control protest sparked by an anti-Islamic film, despite intelligence pointing to a more coordinated terror attack.
Some GOP lawmakers are threatening to hold up her confirmation if she’s tapped to be the next Secretary of State.
In Washington, Jared Halpern, FOX News Radio.
WATCH for more on relations between some GOP lawmakers and UN Ambassador Susan Rice:
READ a statement by UN Ambassador Susan Rice:
“Today, Acting CIA Director Michael Morell and I met with Senators McCain, Graham, and Ayotte to discuss my September 16th public comments regarding the attack against the U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya, and the intelligence assessments that formed the basis for those comments. I appreciated the opportunity to discuss these issues directly and constructively with them.
In the course of the meeting, we explained that the talking points provided by the intelligence community, and the initial assessment upon which they were based, were incorrect in a key respect: there was no protest or demonstration in Benghazi. While, we certainly wish that we had had perfect information just days after the terrorist attack, as is often the case, the intelligence assessment has evolved. We stressed that neither I nor anyone else in the Administration intended to mislead the American people at any stage in this process, and the Administration updated Congress and the American people as our assessments evolved.
The Administration remains committed to working closely with Congress as we thoroughly investigate the terrorist attack in Benghazi and bring to justice the terrorists responsible for the tragic deaths of our colleagues, Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods. We also look forward to the findings of the Accountability Review Board and the FBI investigation.”



Frank
November 27, 2012 at 6:45 pm
Am I the only veteran that was exposed to "classified information" who remembers the phrase "need to know"? The critics of Dr. Susan Rice are saying that our Ambassador to the United Nations must have had access to classified information on the Benghazi event. Our government protects classified information by limiting access to it – exclusively to only those with the "need to know". Is it possible that Dr. Rice’s accusers are ignorant of the “need to know” principle of protecting classified information? Dr. Rice, as Ambassador to the United Nations, was not directly involved in what the State Department did before the Benghazi event, nor was she directly involved in the investigation by the CIA after the Benghazi event. Therefore, she did not have the “need to know” regarding any classified information regarding the event or the investigation. Her comments on the Sunday talk shows were based upon the information provided her by the White House and the CIA, and NOT classified information.